Which action is correct when reviewing a patient's prior medications?

When reviewing a patient's prior medications, marking the list as reviewed is an important step in ensuring proper documentation and continuity of care. This action signifies that the clinician has adequately examined the medication history, helping to prevent potential medication errors and ensuring that all relevant information has been considered before prescribing new medications or making treatment decisions.

By marking it as reviewed, the healthcare provider communicates that this crucial aspect of the patient's history has been taken into account, creating a reliable record for future reference. This contributes to the overall accuracy of the patient's medical record and assists any other professionals who may access the information later.

The other actions, while they may seem relevant, do not fulfill the essential requirement of indicating that the review process has been completed in a formal manner. Skipping the review is not an option because it neglects a critical aspect of patient safety. Printing the list for records does not communicate that the review has taken place. Requesting verification from the patient is a valuable step but should occur in conjunction with or after the review process, not as a standalone action to conclude the review. Thus, marking it as reviewed provides a clear indication of thoroughness and accountability in patient care.